Cartwright

Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Cartwright

Good Law
195 F.2d 80·30 A.L.R. 2d 1229·1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3856
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 195213017_1California1,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Denman, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment against Comet Theatre Enterprises, Inc., hereafter Comet, a California corporation, plaintiff in an action against appellees, citizens of Utah, on a common count for money had and received. Recovery was sought by Comet of money voluntarily paid to the defendants for their full performance of a contract for services of a supervisory nature rendered by the defendants to Comet in connection with the construction of the latter’s drive-in theatre. Comet contends that it is entitled to judgment because, as admitted, the defendants were not licensed under California Business and Professions Code, Sections 7025-7031.

On the basis of the Findings of Fact below, we conclude that the defendants were contractors within the meaning of the Business and Professions Code. That Code required contractors to procure a license from a board created 'by the Act. The effect of the defendants’ failure to get a license is stated in Loving & Evans v. Blick, 33 Cal.2d 603 , 204 P.2d 23 where the California court held a contract made by an unlicensed contractor is illegal and void. The only provisions of the Act imposing sanctions on unlicensed persons are Section 7030…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.