Pringle

Pringle v. La Chapelle

Good Law
1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 693·73 Cal. App. 4th 1000·87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 90·99 Daily Journal DAR 7675·99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6051
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 1999B125935California2,454 words

Opinion

Opinion

Aldrich, J.

Introduction

Plantiff and respondent Yvonne M. Renfrew, an attorney, sued defendant and appellant Frank La Chapelle for attorney fees. La Chapelle appeals from the judgment entered in favor of Renfrew. We affirm.

Factual and Procedural Background

La Chapelle provides an appendix in lieu of a clerk’s transcript and a supplemental appendix as the record on appeal. We have not been provided with a reporter’s transcript and the provided appendices are incomplete. Further, the statement of the case is inadequate as there are few citations to the record. We recite only those facts either admitted by both parties, or for which we find factual support in the limited record before us.

Renfrew filed a complaint against La Chapelle and Interscience Computer Corporation (Interscience). Renfrew alleged she was owed money for legal services rendered to La Chapelle and Interscience pursuant to written fee agreements.

Attached to the complaint were two written fee agreements. The first agreement, dated March 7, 1996, was executed by Michael W. Brennan, as president of Interscience. It authorized Renfrew to render legal services to Interscience to defend against claims of harassment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.