Wilson

Wilson v. Century 21 Great Western Realty

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 4th 298·18 Cal. Rptr. 2d 779·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 468·93 Daily Journal DAR 5507·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3173
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1993A055409California3,767 words

Opinion

Opinion

Smith, J.

Plaintiffs John and Carolyne Wilson bought a home in Walnut Creek and later brought this action against the seller’s real estate brokerage and agent, Century 21 Great Western Realty (Century 21) and Harry Kraft, after realizing that the home had foundation problems. The case was tried to a jury on theories of fraud, negligent misrepresentation and negligence, but the court granted a nonsuit at the close of evidence which left only the fraud cause of action. In a special verdict, the jury found that defendants had concealed or suppressed a material fact, but not with an intent to defraud. This appeal by plaintiffs from judgment on the verdict comes after the court denied their motions for new trial and judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

At issue here are the duties of a seller’s broker to discover and disclose material defects to a home buyer, duties imposed by Civil Code sections 1102-1102.15, 2079 and 2079.2. We affirm the judgment.

Background

A nonsuit is properly granted only if, as a matter of law, the evidence presented by the plaintiff is insufficient to permit a jury to find in his favor. Both the trial court and this court view the evidence most favorably to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.