Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Superior Court

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 4th 547·19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 24·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 472·93 Daily Journal DAR 5489·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3212
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1993D015454California5,856 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

The Supreme Court in Knight v. Jewett (1992) 3 Cal.4th 296 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 2 , 834 P.2d 696 ] and Ford v. Gouin (1992) 3 Cal.4th 339 [ 11 Cal.Rptr.2d 30 , 834 P.2d 724 ] has recently outlined a set of rules for the proper application of the “assumption of risk” doctrine in negligence cases in light of California comparative fault principles. We are now required to apply those rules to causes of action sounding in strict products liability and breach of warranty. In this petition for writ of mandate, petitioner Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation (Milwaukee) (defendant in an action by plaintiff and real party in interest Lawrence Vondrasek for damages for personal injury on the theories of strict liability, breach of warranty, and negligence) argues it is entitled to extraordinary relief from the trial court’s order denying in part Milwaukee’s motion for summary adjudication. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (f).) The adjudication which Milwaukee sought would have established that its affirmative defense of reasonable implied assumption of the risk barred Vondrasek’s claims for strict products liability and breach of warranty, relating to the injuries he suffered while…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.