Ocean Services Corp. v. Ventura Port District

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 4th 1762·19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 750·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 549·93 Daily Journal DAR 6545·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3816
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 25, 1993B057637California6,277 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

An action is brought against a governmental entity. The governmental entity asserts as a defense the party’s failure to comply with the governmental claims statute. We hold, among other things, that through its conduct a governmental entity may be estopped from asserting failure to comply with the claims statute.

We also hold the governmental entity breached a covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

In addition, the five-year mandatory dismissal statute was tolled.

Ventura Port District (VPD) appeals from a $16,971,767 judgment in favor of respondent, Ocean Services Corporation (OSC), and an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. We affirm. [[/]]

Facts

VPD was established in 1952 to operate and develop the Ventura Harbor, a small coastal harbor consisting of 24 parcels and 189 acres of land and water. During the first 25 years of its existence, it lacked the necessary capital to develop a commercial marina. In 1977 VPD hired Gerald Barney to act as the port district general manager and to create a comprehensive development plan.

Barney devised a plan to lease sections of the harbor for commercial development. In 1979 he offered OSC an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.