Ateeq

Ateeq v. Najor

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 4th 1351·19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 320·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 536·93 Daily Journal DAR 6387·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3752
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 4, 1993D014363California2,871 words

Opinion

Opinion

Work, J.

Elia Najor appeals a judgment in favor of George Ateeq after the jury returned a special verdict in Ateeq’s favor and the court subsequently denied Najor’s motion for judgment based on a statute of limitations defense. Najor asserts the court erred in finding he was estopped from pleading the statute of limitations defense because of the duress he imposed on Ateeq through wrongful threats of deportation. Najor also asserts the court erred in finding he waived his objections to certain evidence offered by Ateeq for failure to state any objections to such evidence in the joint disposition conference report. Finally, he asserts the court erred in demanding he provide Ateeq with his personal financial statement, and, as a result, the punitive damages award should be reversed. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment.

I

Since only a brief description of the factual background is necessary to dispose of this appeal, we provide just a short summary of the complex, and oftentimes confusing or nebulous, facts in this matter. Ateeq was born in Iraq in 1928 and eventually acquired and operated businesses there. In 1975, he visited the United States and met Najor, an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.