Diep

Diep v. California Fair Plan Assn.

Good Law
15 Cal. App. 4th 1205·19 Cal. Rptr. 2d 591·1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 519·93 Daily Journal DAR 6039·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3537
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 12, 1993B056315California2,178 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ortega, J.

We affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the defendant.

Background

Plaintiff Bao Tan Diep, doing business as Maxim’s Mattress Co., housed his business in a warehouse, which was covered by an insurance policy issued by defendant California Fair Plan Association. Plaintiff leased the property from Wendy and Allen Hart. The Harts contracted with Gruver Construction to repair the roof. Gruver removed a portion of the roof and covered the opening with plastic sheeting. According to plaintiff, during two rain storms, “the plastic sheeting was blown open, rain entered and flooded the property, causing extensive damage to appellant’s warehoused mattresses.”

Plaintiff sued the Harts and Gruver, and later amended to add defendant. Plaintiff secured an arbitration award against the Harts and Gruver, which has been satisfied. The Harts and Gruver are not party to this appeal.

Defendant sought summary judgment on two grounds, that failure to give proper and timely notice of the claim defeated coverage, and that since the plastic sheeting did not constitute a “roof,” the policy did not cover the occurrence. Although the trial court granted summary judgment on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.