Gueyffier

Gueyffier v. Ann Summers, Ltd.

Good Law
144 Cal. App. 4th 166·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1662·2006 Daily Journal DAR 14217·50 Cal. Rptr. 3d 294·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9970
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 26, 2006B186996California12,809 words

Opinion

Opinion

This appeal arises out of cross-proceedings to confirm and vacate an international commercial arbitration award entered in California following an American Arbitration Association adjudication. The arbitration occurred under a franchise agreement between Celine Gueyffier (plaintiff), a French citizen residing in the United States, and Ann Summers, Ltd., a British corporation (defendant). [1] The franchise agreement provided, as an expressly material term, that defendant could not be found in breach of the contract absent prompt detailed written notice of the alleged breach and a reasonable opportunity to cure. The franchise agreement, including the arbitration clause, also barred the arbitrator from modifying any of its material terms. Defendant appeals from a September 12, 2005 judgment confirming the arbitration award in favor of plaintiff. Defendant contends the arbitrator exceeded his powers when he failed to enforce the notice and cure provision; therefore, the award must be vacated.

Under California arbitration law, specifically Code of Civil Procedure [2] section 1286.2, subdivision (a)(4), a court must vacate an arbitration award if it finds the arbitrator…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.