Iskenderian

Iskenderian v. Iskenderian

Good Law
144 Cal. App. 4th 1162·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1808·2006 Daily Journal DAR 15202·51 Cal. Rptr. 3d 163·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10616
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 17, 2006B183419California4,385 words

Opinion

Opinion

Boland, J.

SUMMARY

Following a bench trial, the court found that rights to the trademark “Zankou Chicken” were validly assigned to two trusts, and that the trusts properly and effectively directed the distribution of the trademark rights to the three adult children of the trustor. We affirm the trial court’s order.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Rita Iskenderian brought a petition under Probate Code section 850, seeking a determination concerning the ownership of the trademark or trade name “Zankou Chicken.” She alleged that a trust created by her late mother-in-law, Markrid Iskenderian, purporting to distribute the rights to the trademark equally among her (Markrid’s) three children, was ineffective because the trademark was not the property of the trust. She alleged her late husband Mardiros, Markrid’s son, held all rights to the trademark at the time of his death, and she (Rita) is now the exclusive owner of the mark.

A bench trial elicited these facts. Vartkes and Markrid Iskenderian opened a chicken restaurant called Zankou Chicken in Beirut, Lebanon, many years ago. Vartkes and Markrid had three children: a son, Mardiros, and two daughters, Dzovig and Haygan. (We refer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.