Demirdjian

People v. Demirdjian

Good Law
144 Cal. App. 4th 10·2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1654·2006 Daily Journal DAR 14159·50 Cal. Rptr. 3d 184·2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9910
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 24, 2006B188113California2,399 words

Opinion

Opinion

Epstein, J.

In this case, we affirm the imposition of two consecutive terms of 25 years to life (with possibility of parole) based on two special circumstance murders. We reject appellant’s arguments that imposition of consecutive terms violates constitutional proscriptions against cruel and/or unusual punishment. We also reject his claim that the punishment is not authorized by statute.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL SUMMARY

After a declaration of mistrial when the initial jury was unable to reach a verdict, Michael Hrayr Demirdjian was convicted by a second jury of the murders of Blaine Taimo, Jr., and Chris McCulloch, with multiple murder and torture-murder special circumstances. (The jury rejected a third special circumstance: robbery felony murder.) Appellant Demirdjian was 15 years old when the crimes were committed. He was sentenced to two terms of life imprisonment without possibility of parole. He raised several arguments on appeal, including a contention that the sentence was cruel and unusual, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In an unpublished opinion, we rejected these arguments and affirmed the conviction. After remittitur issued on that appeal, appellant sought relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.