Romero

Romero v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

Good Law
156 Cal. App. 4th 211·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1727·67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 236
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 2007C053700California3,115 words

Opinion

Opinion

Blease, J.

The son of plaintiff Jose Reynaldo Romero and Linda Brekelmans was killed in an accident involving defendant Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E). Linda Brekelmans brought a wrongful death action against PG&E, naming but not serving her husband as a nominal defendant under Code of Civil Procedure section 382. She settled the action with PG&E without the participation of Romero and it was dismissed.

Thereafter, Romero brought this action for wrongful death against PG&E. This is an appeal from the judgment of dismissal after the trial court sustained PG&E’s demurrer without leave to amend. The issue is whether a tortfeasor waives the protection of the one action rule when it enters into a settlement of a wrongful death action that does not include an heir who has been made a nominal defendant in the action pursuant to section 382, but has not been served.

A tortfeasor waives the protection of the one action rule by settling with less than all the known heirs if such heirs are not a party to the action. (Valdez v. Smith (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 723, 726-727 [ 212 Cal.Rptr. 638 ].) An heir named as a nominal defendant under section 382 but not served with a summons and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.