Rivera

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS OPINION IS DEPUBLISHED UPON GRANTING OF PETITION FOR REVIEW. THE OPINION APPEARS BELOW WITH A GRAY BACKGROUND.] [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 62 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 63 OPINION After the trial court denied a motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5 ), Juan Rivera entered a negotiated guilty plea to carrying a concealed dirk or dagger (Pen. Code, § 12020 , subd. (a)(4)). The court sentenced him to prison for the two-year middle term. Rivera contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress *Page 64 In our original opinion, a majority reversed the judgment, concluding an anonymous tip did not justify the search of a residence and the subsequent detention and arrest of Rivera. The California Supreme Court granted review and reversed, holding that the initial search of the residence was lawful. ( People v. Rivera (2007) 41 Cal.4th 304 [ 59 Cal.Rptr.3d 473 , 159 P.3d 60 ] ( Rivera ).) The Supreme Court remanded,…