Hebert

People v. Hebert

Bad Law
156 Cal. App. 4th 1114·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1842·67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 893
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 13, 2007C054280California2,817 words

Opinion

Opinion

One spring evening, officers, responded to an uncompleted 911 call from defendant Joseph Hebert's residence. [1] Defendant admitted he had earlier smoked "speed" and told officers his kitchen contained drugs. Two years later, on Christmas Eve, defendant repeatedly made harassing phone calls to a 911 operator, requesting sexual favors and threatening to kill the President. When officers took defendant into custody, they found a small baggie of methamphetamine.

The first incident resulted in a complaint charging defendant with possession of cocaine base, being under the influence of a controlled substance, and possession of drug paraphernalia. (Health and Saf. Code, §§ 11350, 11550, subd. (a), 11364.) Defendant entered a plea of no contest to possession of cocaine base. The trial court granted defendant probation on the condition he complete a Proposition 36 drug treatment program. (Pen.Code, § 1210.1.)

The second incident resulted in an information charging defendant with felony possession of methamphetamine and misuse of a 911 emergency line. (Health & Saf.Code, § 11377, subd. (a); Pen.Code, § 653x.) Defendant entered a negotiated plea of no contest.

After defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.