Bradwell

Bradwell v. Superior Court

Good Law
156 Cal. App. 4th 265·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 1731·67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 163
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 19, 2007C054546California2,774 words

Opinion

Opinion

Davis, J.

In this writ of prohibition proceeding, we conclude that a welfare fraud conviction under Welfare and Institutions Code section 11483 cannot be used as the prior (theft-related) conviction for a Penal Code section 666 criminal charge of petty theft with a prior. Consequently, we issue a peremptory writ directing the dismissal of such a charge against petitioner Tina Bradwell.

Background

Over petitioner’s objection at the preliminary hearing, the Placer County trial court held petitioner to answer a charge of “petty theft with a prior” (Pen. Code, § 666), where the “prior” consisted solely of petitioner’s prior conviction for welfare fraud under Welfare and Institutions Code section 11483. The trial court reasoned that “welfare fraud is a specie[s] of theft” and that Penal Code section 666 “encompasses both petty theft and grand theft.”

After unsuccessfully moving to set aside'this charge pursuant to Penal Code section 995, petitioner filed a petition for writ of prohibition with this court, requesting a peremptory writ and a stay restraining the trial court from proceeding with this criminal action against her. (Pen. Code, § 999a.) After considering opposition from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.