Kashmiri

Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of California

Good Law
156 Cal. App. 4th 809·67 Cal. Rptr. 3d 635
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 15, 2007A113662California16,874 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Mohammad Kashmiri, Benson R. Cohen, Anupama K. Menon, Sally Schwettmann, John Alden, Janet Lee, Teddy Miller, and Jennifer Blake, individually and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons (collectively, respondents), filed an action for injunctive and declaratory relief and for damages against The Regents of the University of California (the Regents or University) after the University increased various fees. The University asserts that it did not breach any contract with the students and, even if it did, this court should reduce the damages by the amount of grant money provided by the University to the students.

We conclude that implied contracts were formed between the University and respondents. The University breached its contracts with the professional students when it raised the professional educational fees for continuing students after promising on its Web site and in its catalogues that such fees would not be raised for the duration of the students’ enrollment in the professional program. The University also breached its contracts with the students attending the spring and summer sessions in 2003 by raising the educational fees for these terms after the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.