Charles A. Pratt Construction Co. v. California Coastal Commission

Good Law
162 Cal. App. 4th 1068·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 684·76 Cal. Rptr. 3d 466·38 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20111
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2008B190122California4,695 words

Opinion

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

If “it’s a long, long time from May to December,” it’s an eternity from 1973 to 2008. But time, as Einstein taught us, is relative.

From a developer’s perspective, time stops when rights vest. Government Code section 66498.1 confers a vested right to proceed with a development that complies with local ordinances in effect when a local agency approves a vesting tentative map. But if a development does not comply with state and federal laws, the march of time is inexorable notwithstanding section 66498.1. This illustrates yet another perspective about time: “Nothing endures but change.” (Heraclitus, a Greek philosopher, 540-475 B.C.)

Charles A. Pratt Construction Co., Inc. (Pratt), filed this petition for a writ of administrative mandate, ordinary mandate and for damages against the California Coastal Commission (Commission). Pratt sought an order requiring the Commission to set aside its decision denying it a coastal development permit under the California Coastal Act of 1976 (Pub. Resources Code, § 30000 et seq. (Coastal Act)), and for damages arising from a regulatory taking of its property. The trial court denied Pratt’s petition for writ of administrative or ordinary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.