Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co. v. City of Union City

Good Law
162 Cal. App. 4th 686·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 634·75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 839
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2008A114956California5,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rivera, J.

This case presents the question of whether a fee imposed on telephone lines by defendant City of Union City (the City) to fund its 911 emergency communication system is a special tax that must be approved by two-thirds of the voters in the City. The trial court ruled it was a tax, and entered judgment against the City and in favor of the plaintiffs in this action for declaratory relief. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

The Legislature enacted the Warren-911 -Emergency Assistance Act (Gov. Code, § 53100 et seq.) (the Warren Act) in 1972. The Warren Act declared that the establishment of a uniform, statewide emergency number was a matter of statewide concern, and required every local public agency to establish and operate, or to be part of, a “basic system” that automatically connects a person dialing the digits 911 to a public safety answering point. (§§53100, 53107, 53109.)

In 2003, the City established an “Emergency Communication System Response Fee” (the Fee) (City Mun. Code, ch. 7.20) by adopting ordinance No. 617-03 (the Ordinance). The Fee was imposed on “every person who maintains access to the 911 communication system by subscribing to local telephone service within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.