YU FANG TAN v. Arnel Management Co.

Good Law
162 Cal. App. 4th 621·2008 Cal. App. LEXIS 633·75 Cal. Rptr. 3d 849
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 2008B197706California5,798 words

Opinion

Opinion

Certified for Partial Publication. [*]

Plaintiff Yu Fang Tan was: shot in an attempted carjacking in the ungated portion of the common area of his apartment complex. He, along with this wife Chun Kuei Chang and son (together, plaintiffs), sued the management company and property owners, defendants Arnel Management Company, Pheasant Ridge Investment Company, and Colima Real Estate Company, for failure to take steps to properly secure their premises against foreseeable criminal acts of third parties. After an Evidence Code section 402 hearing held in limine, the trial court ruled that three prior violent crimes against others on the premises' common areas were not sufficiently similar crimes to the one perpetrated on plaintiff to impose a duty on defendants to protect tenants of the apartment complex. The court entered judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

In the published portion of this opinion, we hold that plaintiffs' evidence of three prior violent attacks by strangers in the common areas of the apartment complex were sufficiently similar to the attack on plaintiff to provide substantial evidence of the necessary degree of foreseeability to give rise to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.