Slavin

Slavin v. Fink

Bad Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 566·25 Cal. App. 4th 722·30 Cal. Rptr. 2d 750·30 Cal. Rptr. 750·94 Daily Journal DAR 7766
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 6, 1994B065767California1,516 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hastings, J.

This is a companion case to Slavin v. Borinstein, ante, page 713 [ 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 745 ]. In this action Leon Slavin (respondent), a building contractor, sued Albert Fink (appellant), an agent of Joan Borinstein (Borinstein), for recovery of construction fees, costs and lost profits relating to a residence being constructed by respondent for Borinstein. In the companion action, respondent sued Borinstein for the same damages. Borinstein also sued respondent claiming construction defects. The actions were consolidated and tried at the same time. Allan A. Sigel (Sigel) of Sigel & Boothe represented Fink and Borinstein in all actions.

On November 22, 1991, a judgment was rendered in favor of respondent and against Borinstein awarding him sums for unpaid construction costs plus interest, unpaid contractor’s fees plus interest and loss of net profits plus interest for a total sum of $875,644.17. An offset was awarded in favor of Borinstein in the amount of $36,430.21, without interest. The trial court found that Fink was the disclosed agent for Borinstein relating to his negotiations with respondent on her behalf and awarded judgment in favor of Fink and against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.