Venegas

People v. Venegas

Good Law
25 Cal. App. 4th 1731·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 114
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 1994Docket Nos. A061818, A063917California4,018 words

Opinion

Opinion

Chin, J.

Augustine Venegas (hereafter appellant) appeals after a jury conviction of possessing a weapon in state prison. (Pen. Code, former § 4502 [now § 4502, subd. (a)].) He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for change of venue and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel. In a consolidated petition for writ of habeas corpus, he challenges his sentence. The court imposed a full four-year upper term “consecutive to any and all other sentences [appellant] is now serving,” including a 1986 term appellant received for another offense he committed in prison. Appellant contends that, pursuant to section 1170.1, subdivisions (a) and (c) (hereafter sections 1170.1(a) and 1170.1(c) respectively), the court instead should have imposed a sentence of one-third of the middle term. We affirm the conviction, but grant the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and remand for resentencing.

Facts

On August 17, 1992, Pelican Bay Prison Correctional Officer Mike Armstrong was in a control booth, releasing prisoners for breakfast. Another officer yelled, and Armstrong heard a scuffle begin in the other officer’s area. Shortly afterward, Armstrong saw an inmate named…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.