Conservatorship of McKeown

Bad Law
25 Cal. App. 4th 502·30 Cal. Rptr. 542·1994 WL 230789
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 31, 1994D018844California2,508 words

Opinion

Opinion

Peter W. Singer, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Objector and Appellant.

Lloyd M. Harmon, Jr., County Counsel, Diane Bardsley, Chief Deputy County Counsel, Bruce D. MacLeish and Janice L. Ingold, Deputy County Counsel, for Petitioner and Respondent.

OPINION

NARES, J.

James S. McKeown III appeals an order reestablishing a conservatorship of his person after the trial court denied his motion to dismiss the reestablishment petition for lack of jurisdiction. McKeown also contends the trial court erred in instructing the jury regarding expert testimony. We affirm.

A one-year conservatorship for McKeown was established on April 16, 1992. On March 22, 1993, the public conservator filed a petition to reestablish conservatorship. A hearing on the petition was noticed for April 15, 1993. McKeown, through his attorney, appeared specially reserving the right to contest jurisdiction, waived the hearing, and demanded a jury trial.

McKeown filed a motion to dismiss the reestablishment petition for lack of jurisdiction. McKeown alleged the citation for conservatorship of the person was issued by a department of social services clerk and not by the court clerk or under court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.