Intel Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Good Law
756 F. Supp. 1292·1991 WL 33703·21 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1623·1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20338
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaFebruary 28, 1991C-90-20571-WAICalifornia3,475 words

Opinion

Opinion

Ingram, J.

MEMORANDUM OF INTENDED DECISION

PREAMBLE

This application for permanent injunction, and for finding of validity and infringement of plaintiffs asserted trademark is one of several phases of the trial of the above-entitled action. This first phase came duly on for trial before the court on January 7, 1991 and proceeded for sixteen trial days, and was submitted for decision on February 7, 1991. Following submission, both sides filed memoranda and briefing on discrete issues. I have carefully considered those submissions.

This Memorandum of Intended Decision constitutes Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law consistent with the provisions of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a).

Inasmuch as this is a Memorandum of Intended Decision, and is decisive of only some of the issues included in the above-entitled action, I will entertain argument on objections to findings encompassed herein prior to the entry of any judgment herein, to be conducted at a time mutually convenient to counsel and to me.

This decision is dispositive of this first phase of the case. However, mindful that this disposition may not survive appellate scrutiny, and that an appellate court may find that a group composed of end…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.