Jones

Jones v. Déjà Vu, Inc.

Good Law
419 F. Supp. 2d 1146·2005 WL 1629941·2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41266
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJune 30, 2005C 05-0997 BZCalifornia1,797 words

Opinion

Opinion

Zimmerman, J.

ORDER ON MOTIONS OF DEFENDANTS CHOWDER HOUSE, INC. AND SAW ENTERTAINMENT, LTD. TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

Defendants Chowder House, Inc. dba Hungry I and SAW Entertainment, Ltd. dba Larry Flynt’s Hustler Club have moved to compel arbitration of all claims of plaintiffs Kimberly Jones, and Jane Roes One through Six. Plaintiffs, current and former dancers at various of defendants’ clubs, assert on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, nineteen causes of action, which fall into three distinct groups. The first five are brought by those plaintiffs who allege they own a club that is subject to various unfair and anti-competitive acts committed by defendants. A second group of claims alleges that defendants engage in a variety of unlawful employment practices. A third group accuses defendants of racial discrimination. Defendants’ motions are granted in part, and denied in part for the following reasons:

1. The arbitration provision is proeedurally unconscionable. See Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc., 328 F.3d 1165, 1171 (9th Cir.2003). It was drafted by the party with a superior bargaining position; offered on essentially a take-it-or-leave-it basis; and provided without a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.