Stolz

Stolz v. Wong Communications Limited Partnership

Good Law
1994 Cal. App. LEXIS 636·25 Cal. App. 4th 1811·31 Cal. Rptr. 2d 229·75 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 935·94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4685
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1994C016473California4,632 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Plaintiff Edward Royce Stolz II, transacting business as Royce International Broadcasting Station KWOD-FM, appeals from summary judgment entered in favor of defendants Wong Communication Limited Partnership, Kin Shaw Wong, and Fay Gum Wong (the Wong defendants), in plaintiffs action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and interference with economic relations. Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in determining no cause of action was stated by the complaint’s allegations that defendants maliciously filed with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) an application competing with plaintiff’s application to renew a license to operate a particular radio frequency. Plaintiff also purports to appeal from summary judgment in favor of defendants Paul Besozzi, Stephen Diaz Gavin, and Besozzi & Gavin (the attorney defendants).

We shall affirm the judgment in favor of the Wong defendants and dismiss the appeal as to the attorney defendants.

Factual and Procedural Background

In March 1992, plaintiff filed this action against the Wong defendants and their attorneys, asserting causes of action for malicious prosecution, abuse of process, and “interference with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.