Commercial Capital Bankcorp, Inc. v. St. Paul Mercury Insurance

Good Law
419 F. Supp. 2d 1173·2006 WL 592923·2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25039
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJanuary 23, 2006SACV05-1141 CJC RNBXCalifornia5,689 words

Opinion

Opinion

Carney, J.

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (filed 11/21/05)

Plaintiff, the insured on a directors’ and officers’ and company liability insurance policy issued by Defendant, moves for summary judgment in its favor on the issue of whether Defendant owes a duty to advance on a current basis 100 percent of the reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs Plaintiff becomes obligated to pay in defending itself, its subsidiary, and several officers and employees in a currently-ongoing lawsuit. Because Defendant has no contractual or other duty to advance those fees and costs on a current basis, Plaintiffs motion is DENIED.

A. Background

1. The Policy

Defendant St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company issued Plaintiff a directors’ and officers’ and company liability policy (the “St. Paul Policy”), with a policy period of June 4, 2005 to June 4, 2006. (Plaintiffs Exh. A.) The policy has a $20,000,000 limit of liability, and provides for a retention amount of either $500,000 or $250,000 depending on the type of underlying claim for which liability coverage is sought and the applicable insuring agreement. The policy further provides in relevant part:

“Insured…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.