In Re Henry

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 4th 522·14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 496
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 2004A103586California3,296 words

Opinion

Opinion

The fundamental right to the care and custody of one's child is protected by constitution and statute. ( In re Kieshia E. (1993) 6 Cal.4th 68, 76 , 23 Cal. Rptr.2d 775 , 859 P.2d 1290 ; In re Basilio T. (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 155, 169-170 , 5 Cal.Rptr.2d 450 .) A child may not be taken from a parent's physical custody during juvenile dependency proceedings, except for a temporary detention period, unless clear and convincing evidence supports a ground for removal specified by the Legislature. Removal on any ground not involving parental rejection, abandonment, or institutionalization requires a finding that there are no reasonable means of protecting the child without depriving the parent of custody. (Welf. & Inst.Code § 361, subd. (c); see In re Cynthia D. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 242, 253 , 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 698 , 851 P.2d 1307 .) [1]

These basic guidelines establish that out-of-home placement is not a proper means of hedging against the possibility of failed reunification efforts, or of securing parental cooperation with those efforts. It is a last resort, to be considered only when the child would be in danger if allowed to reside with the parent. The law requires that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.