Kilroy

Kilroy v. State

Caution
119 Cal. App. 4th 140·14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 109·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 839·2004 Daily Journal DAR 6536·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4777
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 2, 2004C044877California3,701 words

Opinion

Opinion

Hull, J.

Plaintiffs Kent and Kim Kilroy, doing business as Kilroy’s Towing, initiated this action against defendants State of California and Dave Paulus, a California Highway Patrol (CHP) officer, alleging violation of their civil rights and related torts. Plaintiffs allege that Paulus wrongly omitted material facts from an affidavit used to obtain a warrant to search their business. The search turned up firearms that Kent Kilroy was not permitted to possess and led to his prosecution in federal court. That prosecution was later dismissed after the court granted defendant’s motion to suppress.

In this matter, the trial court denied plaintiffs’ request for judicial notice of the federal court’s suppression order and granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The court concluded that defendants are entitled to immunity on the civil rights claims and that there is no evidence to support plaintiffs’ other causes of action. Plaintiffs contend that the court erred in denying their request for judicial notice. They further contend that issues of fact remain as to whether there was probable cause for the search and whether defendants’ are entitled to immunity. We affirm the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.