Corbett

Corbett v. Hayward Dodge, Inc.

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 4th 915·14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 741·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 984·2004 Daily Journal DAR 7507·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5493
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 22, 2004A103942California5,248 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lambden, J.

Hayward Dodge, Inc. (Hayward Dodge) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its request for attorney fees pursuant to Civil Code section 1780, subdivision (d), following the court’s granting its summary judgment motion against the fourth amended complaint of Thomas Corbett (Corbett). Hayward Dodge complains that the trial court applied a subjective standard of bad faith when the statute required an objective test of whether a reasonable attorney would have believed the claims had merit. Further, it argues the court should have awarded fees under either test. In addition, Hayward Dodge maintains that the court erred in placing the burden of proof on it. We reject Hayward Dodge’s contentions and uphold the trial court’s denial of fees.

BACKGROUND

On April 17, 2000, Corbett, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, filed a complaint for damages and for an injunction against Bank of America, N.A., Bancamerica Auto Finance Corporation, Bank of America Corporation (collectively, Bank of America) and Hayward Dodge. He alleged fraud by concealment, intentional misrepresentation, contract interference, and violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.