Carver

Carver v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.

Good Law
119 Cal. App. 4th 498·14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 467·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 911·2004 Daily Journal DAR 7134·2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5212
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 2004D041829California2,483 words

Opinion

Opinion

McCONNELL, J.

Defendant Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (Chevron) appeals a postjudgment order apportioning attorney fees previously awarded to Chevron as the prevailing party in an action filed by plaintiffs Steve Carver and other lessee-dealers of Chevron-owned service stations (collectively Dealers) for antitrust violations under the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 16720 et seq.), breach of contract, fraud, deceit and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The trial court’s fee apportionment deleted 65 percent of the previous award, finding these fees could not be awarded to Chevron because they related exclusively, or by inextricable overlap, to the Cartwright Act issues.

The parties agree the attorney fees provision of the Cartwright Act (§ 16750, subd. (a)) does not permit an award to a prevailing defendant, and thus Chevron is not entitled to attorney fees attributable to its defense of Cartwright Act claims. However, Chevron contends the court erred by deleting attorney fees incurred by defending issues common to both the Cartwright Act claims and non-Cartwright Act claims. We conclude, as a matter of law, the Cartwright Act’s unilateral fee-shifting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.