Zabelle

People v. Zabelle

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1075·50 Cal. App. 4th 1282·58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 105·96 Daily Journal DAR 13854·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8412
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 31, 1996C022925California1,495 words

Opinion

Opinion

Sims, J.

Following the denial of his motion to suppress (Pen. Code, § 1538.5), defendant Michael St. Clair Zabelle pleaded no contest to a charge of possession of heroin for sale. (Health & Saf. Code, § 11351.)

Sentenced to state prison, defendant appeals, contending his motion to suppress was erroneously denied. We shall affirm the judgment.

Facts

Defendant’s motion to suppress was adjudicated following a special hearing in superior court. The relevant evidence adduced upon that hearing (People v. Neighbours (1990) 223 Cal.App.3d 1115, 1119-1120 [ 273 Cal.Rptr. 32 ]) is as follows:

About 4 p.m. on October 10, 1995, Norvall and his partner were in the Delta Hotel to investigate narcotics activity going on in room 100 or 101.

While walking down a common hallway of the hotel, Norvall noticed that the door to room 208 was wide open. When Norvall looked into the room from the hallway, he saw defendant seated on the bed with his face lying on a dresser at the foot of the bed. Defendant was in a fetal position, and Norvall could not see defendant’s hands nor whether defendant might have anything in his hands. Defendant’s eyes were closed; he appeared to be asleep.

From the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.