Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Operation Rescue

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 997·50 Cal. App. 4th 290·57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 736·96 Daily Journal DAR 13057·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7900
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 28, 1996A070725California5,306 words

Opinion

Opinion

Poche, J.

Defendants Operation Rescue of California and Robert Lynn Cochran appeal from a permanent injunction establishing place and manner restrictions on demonstrations conducted at: (1) a clinic operated by plaintiff Planned Parenthood Association of San Mateo County, and (2) the home of plaintiff Dr. O., a physician who treats patients at the clinic. The primary issue presented is whether the restrictions go beyond the guidelines of Madsen v. Women’s Health Center, Inc. (1994) 512 U.S. 753 [ 129 L.Ed.2d 593 , 114 S.Ct. 2516 ] (Madsen) to impinge upon protected speech.

We conclude: (1) that the ban on protesters coming within 15 feet of the clinic serves significant state interests and is compatible with constitutional requirements; (2) the exclusion of protesters within 250 feet of the apartment building in which the doctor resides cannot be sustained because a less restrictive measure holds reasonable the prospect of striking a more precise balance between the competing goals of preserving personal privacy while maximizing the opportunity for public expression; and, (3) that the portion of the injunction which forbids appellants from “[a]pproaching any Planned Parenthood…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.