U.D. Registry, Inc. v. Municipal Court

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1014·50 Cal. App. 4th 671·57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 788·96 Daily Journal DAR 13209·1996 WL 627713
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 30, 1996G014907California1,021 words

Opinion

Opinion

Rylaarsdam, J.

The superior court issued a writ ordering two municipal courts to grant a company offering a tenant screening service to landlords, access to all unlawful detainer files within the period public access is denied under Code of Civil Procedure section 1161.2. The municipal courts appeal; we apply the statutory mandate and reverse.

Facts

U.D. Registry, Inc. (UDR), a tenant screening company, sought an order allowing it access to all unlawful detainer filings in the municipal courts of the North Orange County and West Orange County Judicial Districts. The North Orange County Court denied the request on ground it did not find good cause. The West Orange County Court denied the motion, finding (1) the statute does not contemplate blanket orders, (2) the exceptions to the statute must be on a case-by-case basis on a showing of good cause, and (3) granting blanket orders would frustrate the intent of the statute.

Thereafter, UDR filed a petition for writ of mandate in the superior court. The superior court granted the writ, finding that “[section] 1161.2 defines suc[c]ess of this pilot project as a reduction of at least fifteen percent in the number of unmeritorious ‘Arrieta’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.