Nunn

People v. Nunn

Good Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1071·50 Cal. App. 4th 1357·58 Cal. Rptr. 2d 294·96 Daily Journal DAR 13841·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8427
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 18, 1996D023930California3,076 words

Opinion

Opinion

Benke, J.

In this case we discuss the limitations imposed by Penal Code section 29 on the scope of opinion testimony concerning a criminal defendant’s state of mind at the time of a charged offense.

Appellant Rodney Holden Nunn was convicted of four counts of attempted murder and nine counts of assault with a deadly weapon. Thirteen section 12022.5, subdivision (a), firearm use allegations and two section 12022.7 infliction of great bodily injury allegations were found true. Nunn was sentenced to a prison term of 39 years, 8 months. He appeals, arguing the trial court erred in excluding defense psychological testimony and that the evidence was insufficient to support two of the attempted murder convictions.

Facts

A. Prosecution Case

About 5:30 p.m. on September 25, 1994, Benito Asencio had finished working at a nearby farm and was sitting on an embankment next to Black Mountain Road waiting for a ride. Two other workers, Efigenio Uriostegui and Emilio Nava, were about three feet away. Eight or nine other men were waiting in the same general area. Appellant was standing behind a fence about 50 feet away holding a rifle and pointing it at the ground. Appellant yelled something…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.