Malveaux

People v. Malveaux

Bad Law
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1077·50 Cal. App. 4th 1425·59 Cal. Rptr. 2d 371·96 Daily Journal DAR 13937·1996 WL 668590
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 19, 1996Docket Nos. B080323, B073853California6,663 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

This case dramatically illustrates how much can go wrong when a trial court takes actions which affect a cause while it is on appeal. As a result this court has been forced to consolidate two appeals from two trials, both involving the same defendant and both arising from the same crime, then order a reference to rehear an issue the trial court decided while the case was pending on appeal. One of the two appeals is from a decision of the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Juvenile Department after appellant had been tried in that court for this crime. The other is from a subsequent trial in adult criminal court for the identical crime. In between these two trials the juvenile court held a sui generis proceeding while its own judgment was on appeal. In that proceeding the judge vacated the juvenile court judgment even though it was on appeal, based on a finding appellant was over 18 when he committed the crime. The adult criminal court then proceeded to conduct its own trial of appellant for this crime, resulting in a conviction which also is on appeal in this court.

We concluded the juvenile court lacked jurisdiction to hold the sui generis proceeding to determine…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.