Ervin

People v. Ervin

Caution
1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 1001·50 Cal. App. 4th 259·57 Cal. Rptr. 2d 728·96 Daily Journal DAR 13014·96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7869
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 25, 1996Docket Nos. B094910, B095631California2,940 words

Opinion

Opinion

Vogel, J.

Christopher Lepte Ervin was convicted by jury of burglary and forcible rape, with a finding that the rape was committed during a residential burglary (Pen. Code, § 667.61, subd. (b)), and he thereafter admitted allegations that he had suffered a prior attempted robbery conviction in 1982 and two prior felony convictions in 1993 (unlawfully taking a vehicle and possession of a firearm by a felon) for which he served a single prior prison term. Ervin was sentenced to state prison for a term of 15 years to life for the rape (§ 667.61, subd. (b)), plus 5 consecutive years for the 1982 prior (§ 667, subd. (a)), with a 4-year concurrent sentence imposed for the burglary count, a term of 20 years to life. The “remaining priors” were stricken. Ervin appeals, contending the maximum sentence the trial court should have imposed was a determinate 16-year sentence under the three strikes law, not an indeterminate life sentence with a 15-year minimum term under section 667.61, subdivision (b). ^e People also appeal, contending Ervin should have been sentenced for the rape under both the three strikes law and section 667.61, subdivision (b), to a term of 30 years to life. We agree with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.