Galland
People v. Galland
Opinion
Opinion
In August 2002, Anthony Andrew Galland pleaded guilty to drug charges after the trial court denied his motions to quash and traverse a search warrant and to suppress evidence seized during the execution of that warrant. In People v. Galland (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th 489 , 10 Cal.Rptr.3d 350 ( Galland ), this court reversed the trial court's order denying these motions and conditionally reversed the judgment to allow the court to conduct in camera review proceedings in accordance with the guidelines set forth in People v. Hobbs (1994) 7 Cal.4th 948 , 30 Cal.Rptr.2d 651 , 873 P.2d 1246 ( Hobbs ). On June 29, 2004, the trial court conducted an in camera review of the warrant in accordance with this court's decision and again denied Galland's motions to quash and traverse a search warrant and to suppress evidence.
In Galland's appeal from the trial court's second order denying his motions to quash and traverse a search warrant and to suppress evidence, he contends the court did not follow the procedure set forth in Hobbs, supra, 7 Cal.4th 948 , 30 Cal. Rptr.2d 651 , 873 P.2d 1246 , erroneously determined the police officers who served the warrant complied with statutory…