Rappaport-Scott

Rappaport-Scott v. Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club

Good Law
146 Cal. App. 4th 831·2007 Cal. App. LEXIS 35·2007 Daily Journal DAR 547·53 Cal. Rptr. 3d 245·2007 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 440
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 2007B184917California2,811 words

Opinion

Opinion

Croskey, J.

Laura Rappaport-Scott appeals a judgment dismissing her complaint against her automobile insurer, Interinsurance Exchange of the Automobile Club (Interinsurance), after the sustaining of a demurrer without leave to amend. She contends Interinsurance unreasonably and in bad faith refused her demand to settle her claim for benefits for bodily injury caused by an underinsured motorist before submitting the claim to arbitration. We conclude that the facts alleged in the complaint are insufficient to state a cause of action for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and therefore affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

1. Factual Background

Interinsurance issued an automobile insurance policy to Rappaport-Scott including coverage for bodily injury caused by uninsured and underinsured motorists. Under the terms of that coverage part, Interinsurance agreed to pay all sums that the insured was “legally entitled to recover” as damages from an uninsured or underinsured motorist because of bodily injury caused by the uninsured or underinsured motorist. The coverage limit for bodily injury caused by uninsured and underinsured motorists was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.