Pecci

People v. Pecci

Good Law
72 Cal. App. 4th 1500·86 Cal. Rptr. 2d 43
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 23, 1999B123090California4,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robert Michael Pecci was convicted of committing various sexual offenses including filming sexual conduct with a minor for a noncommercial purpose in violation of Penal Code section 311.4 subdivision (c). [1] Section 1203.065 subdivision (a) expressly prohibits a grant of probation if this enumerated offense has been committed. The trial court adhered to the letter of the law, ruled that appellant was not eligible for probation, and sentenced him to prison for the upper three-year term. It also imposed consecutive terms for other sexual offenses for an aggregate term of five years.

Appellant contends: "The sentence must be vacated and this matter remanded for reconsideration of appellant's application for probation because the probation ineligibility provision as applied to appellant violated principles of substantive due process, equal protection of the law, and the prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment." We affirm.

Appellant committed the offenses against his 16-year-old niece, J. J. told appellant that she was interested in modeling and appellant offered to pay her to pose nude. They went to a motel room where he videotaped and photographed her in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.