Devereaux

Devereaux v. Latham & Watkins

Bad Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 209·32 Cal. App. 4th 1571·38 Cal. Rptr. 2d 849·95 Daily Journal DAR 2933·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1774
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 6, 1995B076330California4,409 words

Opinion

Opinion

Woods, J.

Robyn R. Devereaux (appellant) appeals the dismissal of her action against Latham & Watkins et al. (collectively, respondent or the firm) for her failure to post security as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 391.3.

The instant appeal is only the latest installment in an acrimonious dispute between the law firm of Latham & Watkins and appellant, a one-time litigation paralegal employed by the firm. In their briefs, each side indulges in unnecessary and inflammatory characterizations of the other which we ignore. For our purposes, the salient facts are as follows: From July 1987 to May 1989, appellant was employed by respondent as a litigation paralegal. After she had been terminated, respondent was sued for overbilling by American International Insurance Company of Puerto Rico, Inc. (AIICO) in connection with respondent’s representation of AIICO in a case entitled In re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation (the Fire Litigation). AIICO subpoenaed appellant who, by deposition, testified against respondent in the AIICO lawsuit. At that deposition, appellant produced certain documents which she had removed upon her termination from respondent’s office,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.