Nordquist

Nordquist v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co.

Good Law
1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 138·32 Cal. App. 4th 555·38 Cal. Rptr. 2d 221·95 Daily Journal DAR 2182·95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1270
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 17, 1995F020310California8,019 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thaxter, J.

In the published portion of this opinion we will uphold the trial court’s decisions on two novel issues: (1) that plaintiff and respondent Brian E. Nordquist, a television station sports director/newscast anchor, is entitled to overtime compensation under subdivision 3 of Industrial Welfare Commission Order No. 11-80 (IWC Order No. 11-80) because he was not exempt as a professional or administrative employee, “engaged in work which is primarily intellectual, managerial, or creative,” and “which requires exercise of discretion and independent judgment” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11110); and (2) that Nordquist was entitled to prejudgment interest following his successful appeal to the superior court following an order by the Labor Commissioner rejecting his compensation claim.

In the unpublished portion of the opinion we will hold that the trial court erred by applying the four-year limitations period of Code of Civil Procedure section 337, subdivision 1 rather than the three-year period of section 338, subdivision (a) to Nordquist’s claim. We will remand with directions to apply the correct statute of limitations and to recalculate the amount of overtime compensation and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.