Rancho Solano Master Ass'n. v. Amos & Andrews, Inc.

Good Law
119 Cal. Rptr. 2d 100·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3919·2002 Daily Journal DAR 3941·97 Cal. App. 4th 681·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3192
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 12, 2002A088304, A088514California3,862 words

Opinion

Opinion

Corrigan, J.

Amos & Andrews, Inc., a general construction company, was sued by the Rancho Solano Masters Association (RSMA) for improper remediation of landslides at the Rancho Solano housing development. In this consolidated appeal, Amos & Andrews appeals the jury’s findings of liability and allocation of fault with regard to two of 13 landslides for which Amos & Andrews was found liable. The landslides occurred in subdivision units owned by homebuilders Emerald Homes (Emerald) and the Marker Group. Emerald and the Marker Group, who were found strictly liable for defective property conditions, cross-appeal. Both the Marker Group and Emerald claim the court erred in denying their claims of express indemnity against Amos & Andrews and by limiting their attorney fees. Additionally, Emerald claims the court erroneously denied it expert witness fees.

We dismiss the appeal of Amos & Andrews, concluding that Amos & Andrews waived its right to appeal liability as a result of its full satisfaction of judgment with RSMA. As to appeals of the Marker Group and Emerald, the court abused its discretion in its allocation of attorney fees. We reverse and remand the matter for a redetermination of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.