Wang

Wang v. Massey Chevrolet

Good Law
118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 770·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3273·2002 Daily Journal DAR 4135·97 Cal. App. 4th 856·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3307
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2002B147471California7,740 words

Opinion

Opinion

Lillie, J.

In this action alleging, inter alia, fraud in the inducement of an automobile lease, plaintiffs appeal from summary judgment granted in favor of defendant Massey Chevrolet (Massey) on their complaint for damages for fraud and violations of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act (Civ. Code, § 1750 et seq.), and for injunctive relief for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code section 17200. The principal issue on this appeal is whether the trial court properly determined that plaintiffs’ claims were barred by the parol evidence rule.

Factual and Procedural Background

In October 1999, plaintiffs filed the instant action. The first amended complaint (complaint) contains three causes of action: (1) violation of the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, including Civil Code section 1770, subdivision (a)(13) and (14); (2) fraud, and (3) injunctive relief for unfair competition under Business and Professions Code section 17200.

The complaint arises from events in August 1997, when plaintiffs allegedly negotiated with Massey to purchase a Chevrolet Suburban for a total of $35,213; plaintiffs wanted to purchase the vehicle by making an immediate down payment of $20,000 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.