In Re Raphael P.

San Frnacisco Department of Human Services v. Raphael P.

Caution
118 Cal. Rptr. 2d 610·2002 Cal. App. LEXIS 3965·2002 Daily Journal DAR 4059·97 Cal. App. 4th 716·2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3255
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 15, 2002A095206California10,722 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kline, J.

Raphael P. (appellant) appeals from an order of the juvenile court denying him presumed father status in the dependency proceeding concerning minor Raphael P. Ill (Raphael). He contends the trial court’s ruling, based upon a blood test confirming he was not the minor’s biological father, was erroneous. The minor, who took a position contrary to appellant’s in the trial court, has changed position on appeal, now arguing in appellant’s favor. We reverse.

Statement of the Case and Facts

Raphael was bom in August 1997. His birth certificate lists his mother as Niemaha E., age 16, and his father as appellant, age 19.

According to appellant’s declaration, he was in a relationship with Niemaha E. when Raphael was conceived, she told him he was the father and he so believed. Appellant was at this time in a drag rehabilitation program at Walden House. When he was released, appellant went to live with his grandmother, Agnes J., on Duke Court in San Francisco. Niemaha, then four and a half months pregnant, was in a foster home from which she frequently “went ‘AWOL.’ ” Agnes J. tried to arrange with the San Francisco Department of Human Services (Department) for Niemaha to live…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.