Southern California Rapid Transit District v. United Transportation Union

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 482·5 Cal. App. 4th 416·6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 804·92 Daily Journal DAR 4917·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3133
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 9, 1992B058413California2,361 words

Opinion

Opinion

Johnson, J.

The Southern California Rapid Transit District (SCRTD) appeals from an order confirming an arbitration award in favor of the United Transportation Union (union). We affirm.

Facts and Proceedings Below

The present dispute stems from a decision by the Los Angeles County Transportation Commission to create a new transportation system in the San Gabriel Valley to be known as the Foothill Transit Zone (Foothill). Foothill would take over 14 bus lines presently operated by the SCRTD. SCRTD’s consent was required for the takeover of its bus lines.

Initially, the SCRTD refused to consent to the formation of Foothill. However, after the commission began withholding approximately $9 million per month in subsidies from SCRTD, the SCRTD relented and gave its consent to Foothill.

The union and others filed suit against SCRTD, the commission and Foothill to enjoin operation of the new transit zone on the grounds Foothill’s operation violated various provisions of the Public Utilities Code, the union’s collective bargaining agreement with SCRTD and other labor contracts. Following a court trial, the court refused to award a permanent injunction against Foothill’s operation. As to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.