Saari

Saari v. Jongordon Corp.

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 520·5 Cal. App. 4th 797·7 Cal. Rptr. 2d 82·92 Daily Journal DAR 5307·92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3417
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1992A051605California4,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Reardon, J.

A jury found in favor of respondents Tyme Saari, Peggy Dowling and Patrick Hinrichsen on their action for damages against appellant Jongordon Corporation for breach of a contract to cremate the remains of Robert Saari. The complaint had also alleged causes of action for negligent and intentional emotional distress. Motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for new trial were denied.

Jongordon appeals from the judgment and the order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict, contending that (1) Hinrichsen is not entitled to recover damages for emotional distress because he was not closely related to Robert Saari; (2) the $175,000 award of damages to Hinrichsen was excessive; (3) judgment notwithstanding the verdict should have been granted on the claims of Saari and Dowling; and (4) the $62,500 award of damages for emotional distress to Saari was based on inadmissible evidence and/or was excessive. We affirm the judgment and the order denying judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

I. Facts

Respondent Patrick Hinrichsen was the close friend and longtime companion of Robert Saari. The two men lived together in a home they owned in joint tenancy. In December…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.