Wood Pontiac Cadillac v. Superior Court

Good Law
1992 Cal. App. LEXIS 519·5 Cal. App. 4th 810·6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 924·92 Daily Journal DAR 5305·57 Cal. Comp. Cases 270
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 21, 1992A056963California1,272 words

Opinion

Opinion

Perley, J.

Petitioners Wood Pontiac Cadillac and Estate of James Arthur Bianchi, Deceased, are two of the defendants in an action filed by Sandra Grado and Arthur Grado, arising from personal injuries suffered by Sandra Grado, an employee of petitioner Wood Pontiac Cadillac. In their answer to the complaint, petitioners asserted as an affirmative defense that the action is barred by the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation. Sandra Grado (hereinafter real party) filed a motion for summary adjudication of issues asserting that she was not in the course and scope of her employment when she was injured. Respondent court agreed and granted the motion for summary adjudication. Petitioners have timely filed the instant petition challenging that decision. (Code Civ. Proc., § 437c, subd. (a).)

Facts

There is no dispute as to the relevant facts. On January 2, 1990, real party was finance and insurance manager for Wood Pontiac Cadillac. She was paid a percentage of the gross her department produced plus “she earned some flat fees on different insurance policies that she would sell on an individual basis.” She was also provided with an automobile and received other fringe benefits such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.