Krah

People v. Krah

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 4th 534·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1869·2003 Daily Journal DAR 13753·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 853·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10931
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 17, 2003A099383California3,736 words

Opinion

Opinion

Haerle, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

Charles Krah (Krah) appeals a judgment committing him to Atascadero State Hospital pursuant to a jury determination that he is a sexually violent predator. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600, et seq.) Krah contends the judgment must be reversed because the trial court (1) lacked jurisdiction; (2) excluded relevant evidence; and (3) made instructional errors. We affirm.

H. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A. Krah’s background and history of sexual misconduct

Krah was bom in 1930. He was sent to a boy’s home at the age of 10 after he was caught molesting his half sister. When Krah was 17, he entered the military, from which he received a dishonorable discharge.

Krah has three children. He sexually abused at least two of his children during the late 1960’s. On at least one occasion, Krah forced his 11-year-old son to engage in oral copulation with him and his girlfriend at the time. In 1966 Krah began sexually molesting his five-year-old daughter. The abuse continued until 1969, when Krah was arrested after the abuse was reported by a grandparent.

In 1978, Krah went to the home of friend of a friend to watch television. The only other people in the home were a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.