Hansen

Hansen v. Hansen

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 4th 618·2003 Cal. App. LEXIS 1873·2003 Daily Journal DAR 13837·7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 688·2003 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10981
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 18, 2003G031499California1,427 words

Opinion

Opinion

Fybel, J.

We publish our opinion to confirm the principle announced in City of Downey v. Johnson (1968) 263 Cal.App.2d 775, 780 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 830 ] that a conservator, executor, or personal representative of a decedent’s estate who is unlicensed to practice law cannot appear in propria persona on behalf of the estate in matters outside the probate proceedings. When such a nonlawyer brings a nonprobate action in propria persona on behalf of the estate, the proper appellate remedy is to reverse with directions for the trial court to strike the complaint.

Patricia A. Hansen (Patricia), claiming to be the personal representative of the estate of Betty J. Hansen, sued Christine M.L.R. Hansen (Christine), purporting to allege claims for breach of contract, fraud, misrepresentation, and breach of fiduciary duty. Patricia filed the complaint as a general civil matter, not as a petition within the probate matter opened for the estate of Betty J. Hansen. The trial court sustained Christine’s demurrer to the second amended complaint without leave to amend, and Patricia appealed from the subsequent judgment of dismissal. Patricia is not licensed to practice law. Although Patricia retained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.