Glass

People v. Glass

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 4th 1032·2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 6·2004 D.A.R. 200·2004 Daily Journal DAR 200·8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 417
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 6, 2004F041380California1,871 words

Opinion

Opinion

Cornell, J.

We are confronted in this case with an issue of first impression. Penal Code section 12022.8 requires imposition of a five-year sentence enhancement if the defendant causes great bodily injury during the commission of specifically listed sex crimes. Section 269, aggravated sexual assault of a child, subjects a defendant who is found guilty of committing specifically listed sex crimes against a child under 14 years of age and more than 10 years younger than the defendant to a “one strike” sentence of 15 years to life. Section 269 is not one of the sex crimes listed in section 12022.8.

The issue presented is whether a defendant convicted of violating section 269 is also subject to a section 12022.8 enhancement if he or she inflicts great bodily injury during the assault. We conclude a defendant in this position is subject to the five-year enhancement because a violation of section 269 necessarily includes commission of one of the sex crimes listed in section 12022.8.

The jury found that Raymond George Glass raped his 12-year-old stepdaughter, Jane Doe, on two separate occasions and attempted to dissuade her mother, S.G., from testifying against him. The jury convicted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.