Albillo

Albillo v. Intermodal Container Services, Inc.

Good Law
114 Cal. App. 4th 190·8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 350
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 11, 2003B156444California6,053 words

Opinion

Opinion

Todd, J.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Respondents are related transportation entities. The two primary companies are Intermodal Container Service, Inc. and Interstate Consolidation Service, Inc. A division of Intermodal does business as Harbor Rail Transport; a division of Interstate does business as Cartage Service. Together, these entities are involved in local and interstate intermodal freight transportation, which involves the use of two or more modes of transportation for the continuous movement of freight from origin shipper to destination receiver. Intermodal motor carriers, or trucks, are a critical link in the intermodal chain, as they are the only effective means of moving trailers or containers from marine and rail terminals.

Respondents do not own any trucks. Rather, they transport freight by leasing trucks from truck owners and contracting to have those leased trucks operated by the owner or the owner’s drivers. Appellants are a class of all truck owner-operators and drivers who drove trucks owned by those owner-operators, who contracted with respondents to provide transportation services at any time from July 1, 1992 to the present. Named plaintiffs Irwin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.